Sommige gegevens die door deze provider worden verzameld, zijn bedoeld voor personalisatie en het meten van de effectiviteit van advertenties.
Sommige gegevens die door deze provider worden verzameld, zijn bedoeld voor personalisatie en het meten van de effectiviteit van advertenties.
Sommige gegevens die door deze provider worden verzameld, zijn bedoeld voor personalisatie en het meten van de effectiviteit van advertenties.
Leverancier 711
Leverancier 662
Leverancier 532
Leverancier 530
Leverancier 234
Leverancier 208
Leverancier 771
Leverancier 382
Leverancier 483
Leverancier 573
Leverancier 144
9 Dots Media Ltd
AccountInsight Ltd
Adelaide Metrics Inc
Aderize, Inc.
Adjust Digital A/S
Adnami Aps
Adssets AB
Alkimi
Alphalyr SAS
AUDIOMOB LTD
Avar Communications T/A Jobbio
Bannernow, Inc.
BEAPUP SOLUTIONS LTD
Brandhouse/Subsero A/S
Carbonatix LTD
Cavai AS
Channel99, Inc.
CHEQ AI TECHNOLOGIES
Confiant Inc.
Creatopy INC
Dando online LTD
DataDome SA
Demand Science US, LLC
DoubleVerify Inc.
dpa-infocom GmbH
EMBRACE Systems GmbH
Ensighten
fraud0 GmbH
GeoEdge
Grabit Interactive Media Inc dba KERV Interctive
Hiili SL
HUMAN
illuma technology limited
Integral Ad Science (incorporating ADmantX)
IVO Media Ltd
Jetpack Digital LLC
Kidoz Inc.
Kiosked Ltd
Lumen Research Limited
Marketing Science Consulting Group, lnc.
Mirando GmbH & Co KG
Mobavenue Media Pvt Ltd
NEXD
One Tech Group GmbH
Online Media Solutions LTD
Papirfly AS
Playdigo Inc
Polar Mobile Group Inc.
ProgrammaticX LTD
Protected Media LTD
Public Good Software Inc.
Realtime Communication Sthlm AB
Redbranch, Inc dba Fraudlogix
Revcontent, LLC
Revolution Ad
Rockabox Media Ltd
Sarigato Sp. z o.o.
Seenthis AB
Silverbullet Data Services Group
Sipo Inc
Sitewit, Corp
Skimbit Ltd
Smartico
Somplo Ltd
SpinX Pte Ltd
Sqreem Technologies Private Limited
Stream Eye OOD
streaMonkey GmbH
Telecoming S.A.
TMT Digital Inc
Velocity Made Good LLC
Videobot Ltd
Visarity Technologies GmbH
Volentio JSD Limited
VRTCAL Markets Inc
Vudoo Pty Ltd
Vyde Ltd.
YIELDBIRD SP. Z O.O.
Zeit Agency ApS
Kraaijvanger Architects
Blaak 40
3011 TA Rotterdam
The Netherlands
The value of historical inner cities is enormous. From every place in the world people fly out to Paris, Venice, Prague and Amsterdam to gape at the ancient buildings, streets and squares. We look back at the past intensively. How come in real estate, we limit the prediction to business cases of 25 years? In these last years ideas and images of the future city seems to mostly develop in Hollywood. Often resulting in an abstract utopia and dystopian ideas meant to support the story in the movie, but doesn’t function as a developing model for the city.
With Contrast we want to engage a conversation about the city in 500 years. With an outtake for following generation to benefit from this. With contrast we implement an ideal to blend nature and city co-existing in a perfect balance. The best examples of urbanism are cities with a high density. The most beautiful natural areas are mostly untouched. In the vision Contrast we intensify nature as well as the city and we search for contrast between both.
For all successful and thriving cities, lean on the historical value that's largely visited. The growing attention for this mass tourism is so strong that many historic inner cities can barely handle the capacity. Remarkable is that the rest of the city, often multiplied in square meters from the inner city, doesn’t get visited. These areas are built after WWII and developed based on function separation. Business areas, office locations and residential areas are monofunctional and lack the diversity that is valued in the historic city. Many of these areas don’t function well and many buildings are vacant. Theoretically they’re cities undefined.
Current technology allows citizens to work everywhere with laptops and tablets, generate local energy with solar panels and produce on small-scale with 3D-printers. It won’t take long until transport and production run out of particulate matter or CO2 emission. It becomes unnecessary to present functions to certain areas. This study case focuses on the question: which part of the monofunctional areas should either be demolished in the long run, or made available to the nature?
Rotterdam is the ideal test case for this question. A city like no other that continuous renews itself, with plenty space for changes. The thought process focuses on two areas; The Zomerhof kwartier (ZOHO) and the Woudestein Campus. For ZOHO applies that it could be the place where in 500 years the nature can be extended to the inner city. For Woudestein applies that in 500 years it could be located on the edge of the city. The city is truly a city and has a sharp dividing line with nature, that’s truly nature.